Here is an excerpt from a Yom Kippur sermon on American Jews and Israel that I gave at Tikkun v’Or in Ithaca New York. I have just taken a position as part-time rabbi at this congregation. Please feel free to share the sermon with others and I welcome your response. May it be a year of justice, compassion and peace.
Increasingly we, liberal American Jews find ourselves in an agonizing conflict between our loyalty to the Jewish people, our wish to support Israel, and our concern and/or our opposition to the disturbing trends in Israeli society and the policies and actions of the Israeli government. Liberal Jews are increasingly troubled about Israeli policies and actions. It is painful, sometimes even unbearable, for us to listen to the stories like the demolition of the two Palestinian villages that I described. It is very painful for me to talk about them.
The conflict for us is between core values We believe in human rights, in open debate, in democracy. They are the very values we hold dear in relation to our own country and every other country in the world. We criticize our own country’s profound racism, prejudice, inequality, and militarism. And, we are proud of the role many American Jews played in the civil rights struggle, in the peace movement, as advocates for justice on many issues.
If you want to read the entire text of the sermon, here it is:
I want to start my sermon with a kavvanah (spiritual intention) of two quotes, one from the Psalms and the other from Arundhati Roy a contemporary Indian writer.
First, Arundhati Roy: “The trouble is that once you see it, you can’t unsee it. And once you’ve seen it, keeping quiet, saying nothing, becomes as political an act as speaking out. There is no innocence. Either way you are accountable.”
The Psalms:
L’maan achai v’reyai adaberah na shalom bach.
L’maan beyt Adonai eloheynu avaksha tov lach.
For the sake of my brothers, my sisters and friends
I will speak of peace.
For the sake of this planet, the House of God, may I seek goodness and blessing for all.
Ir Amim
During our stay in Israel this year, we took two tours with Ir Amim (City of Nations), a non-profit Israeli organization that educates the public about the reality in Jerusalem. The first tour was in English and included many people from around the world; the second was in Hebrew and we were the only foreigners.
On both trips, we saw with our own eyes the huge Jewish neighborhoods that have been built since 1967 that encircle East/Arab Jerusalem: from Pisgat Ze’ev in the North to Gilo and Har Homa in the South. We saw bypass roads for Jews and a special underground road for Palestinians. We saw the huge Separation Wall. Most shocking, we saw armed Jewish enclaves in the middle of Palestinian neighborhoods such as the Ras El Amud, Sheikh Jarrah, Mt. Olives, Jabal Mukabber and others. These settlers receive full support from the Israeli government. We drove by the expanding settlement created in Ras El Amud that is sponsored by Irving Moskowitz, an American Jewish millionaire. The tours were educational, enlightening — and devastating.
After seeing the reality on the ground, the Israelis on the second tour were all very disheartened; a sense of hopelessness and despair was palpable in the bus. One man was particularly distressed. “What is the solution?” he demanded of our tour guide. Our guide, who had retired after serving many years as a police officer in Jerusalem, insisted that his task was to show us the reality on the ground, not to suggest a solution. Agitated, the man turned to his fellow passengers with the same question. “What do you think? What is the solution?” What emerged was amazing. They all agreed that the only hope was intervention by the United States and the international community. To our astonishment, this group of Israelis all agreed that the only possibility for a resolution was if America put pressure on Israel to relinquish the settlements and to make a peace agreement based on territorial compromise.
For us, as American Jews, it was an enlightening moment. We were close to the end of our stay in Jerusalem and the new American Administration had made the most serious effort yet to do just that, to insist that Israel end all settlement activity. Yet, in response to outrage and massive pressure from the America Jewish community and the Israel lobby, the Administration had backtracked and agreed to a temporary partial freeze on settlements that will end in eight days’ time.
Biden’s visit
In March, Israel welcomed Vice President Biden’s visit with the announcement of new construction in one of the very settlements we had seen on our trip. “Jerusalem is not a settlement, it is our capital,” Prime Minister Netanyahu told the cheering crowd at the AIPAC conference, forgetting to point out that close to 40% of the residents of Jerusalem are Palestinian and that, while vast new Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem had been built encircling Arab/East Jerusalem, not one new Palestinian neighborhood had been built and Palestinians are routinely are denied new building permits.
Many of us were so hopeful to see the new Administration push for a complete freeze on settlement activity, the most basic change needed for any serious negotiation. When the administration backtracked again, it illuminated just how powerful an influence the American Jewish community – our community – has on U.S. policy on Israel. It is our relationship to Israel as American Jews that I want to explore today.
Peter Beinart
In June, Peter Beinart, the former editor of the New Republic, a magazine with a centrist to right wing perspective on Israel, wrote an article entitled, “The Failure of the Jewish Establishment” in the New York Review of Books that stirred controversy and an important ongoing debate in the Jewish world.
Beinart argued that “for several decades the Jewish establishment has asked American Jews to check their liberalism at Zionism’s door and now, to their horror, they are finding that many young Jews have checked their Zionism instead.”
Beinart pointed out that the mainstream Jewish organizations base their argument for American support for Israel on the idea that Israel is a democracy that shares American values. Then the Jewish establishment ignores or downplays the disturbing long-term anti-democratic trends in Israeli society and silences those in America who speak about them.
Beinart pointed to many indications of this anti-democratic trend in Israeli society. Among them:
* The most extreme right wing government in Israel’s history
* An intolerant settler movement that is growing more radical and more entrenched in the Israeli bureaucracy as well as the army
* An ultra-Orthodox population that is increasing dramatically, and a large Russian immigrant community (Both these communities are particularly prone to anti-Arab racism.)
* A poll that shows that 56% of Jewish Israeli high school students and more than 80% of religious high school students would deny Israeli Arabs (i.e. Palestinian citizens of Israel) the right to be elected to the Knesset
* Another poll that indicates that 53% of Israeli Jews, and 77% of those from the former Soviet Union, support encouraging Israeli Arabs to leave the country.
* A coordinated public attack led by members of the ruling coalition against Israeli human rights organizations as traitors to Israel
* A shocking insensitivity to Palestinian suffering
The very week last month that Beinart spoke at the Martha’s Vineyard Hebrew Center, Israeli bulldozers had just demolished the houses of the villagers in El Farsiya in the Jordan Valley.
This demolition was the second time that Israel had carried out a demolition in this village. Beinart pointed out that American Jewish leadership would never mention this incident.
Israel has four times destroyed a Bedouin village of El Arakib. The initial demolition was carried out by a force of hundreds of police officers and soldiers. Just this week, immediately after Rosh Hashana, Israel demolished this village for a fifth time. Once the villagers are moved from their village, the Jewish National Fund will plant a forest on the location. Several other Jewish National Fund parks have been built on the ruins of former Palestinian villages in Israel once their inhabitants were expelled.
Beinart pointed out that American Jewish leaders would never address the issue of what happened in El Farsiya or El Arakib and many other villages as a challenge to Israeli democracy. Worse, they may defend the actions.
Stifling Debate
Leaders of our community go further. They stifle open debate on any anti-democratic actions by Israel – like these demolitions — by calling those who raise these issues in America and in Israel “anti-Israel” or “anti-Semitic.” even though this means calling thousands of American Jews and thousands of Israelis “anti-Semitic.” They have also launched a concerted public attack on the most respected international human rights organizations: Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and others, labeling them also anti-Israel. Beinart argues that this uncritical support for Israel and the stifling of open debate has led to the distancing of young liberal American Jews from Zionism and Israel. “Fewer and fewer American Jewish liberals are Zionists, few and fewer American Jewish Zionists are liberal,” he wrote.
Beinart, who is father of two young children and a devoted member of an Orthodox synagogue, focuses on alienation of young liberal Jews from Israel and Zionism.
He is talking about our children and grandchildren and he is talking about us. Increasingly we, liberal American Jews find ourselves in an agonizing conflict between our loyalty to the Jewish people, our wish to support Israel, and our concern and/or our opposition to the disturbing trends in Israeli society and the policies and actions of the Israeli government. Liberal Jews are increasingly troubled about Israeli policies and actions. It is painful, sometimes even unbearable, for us to listen to the stories like the demolition of the two Palestinian villages that I described. It is very painful for me to talk about them.
The conflict for us is between core values We believe in human rights, in open debate, in democracy. They are the very values we hold dear in relation to our own country and every other country in the world. We criticize our own country’s profound racism, prejudice, inequality, and militarism. And, we are proud of the role many American Jews played in the civil rights struggle, in the peace movement, as advocates for justice on many issues.
For us, the very core of Judaism is:
pursuit of justice (Justice, justice shall you pursue!),
equal human rights for all (God created Adam/human beings in God’s image)
and the pursuit of peace (Seek Peace and Pursue It!)
How can we uphold these core values of our faith in our own country and everywhere else in the world, but not in Israel? How can we turn our eyes and not face the painful reality of the oppression of Palestinians in Israel? How can we be appropriately vocal about Sudan, China, Burma, Zimbabwe, but silent about Israel? Aren’t we responsible first to deal with injustice for which we are directly responsible?
How do we respond to Israeli attitudes, policies and actions that violate what we believe to be the core tenets of our faith? Israel claims to act in the name of the entire Jewish people. Is it acting in our name when it demolishes Palestinian villages? Many of us have enormous grief about what has become of Israel. If we speak about this publicly. will we be called anti-Semitic by fellow Jews? And we feel an inner tug of disloyalty to our people when we criticize.
Delegitimization
Many liberal Jews – and many rabbis — have been cowed into silence by overwhelming pressure from mainstream Jewish leaders. Over the past year in addition to calling critics “self hating,” or “Israel-bashing,” the Jewish establishment has come up with a new term “delegitimation” or “delegitmization”, to silence this criticism .
Just before Rosh Hashana, I saw a glossy brochure for a conference on “War by other means: The Global Campaign to Delegitimize Israel.” The conference will be held at Boston University in October, sponsored by CAMERA, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting.
While there are people and groups in the world who want to delegitimize and destroy Israel, CAMERA and other conservative groups use the term “delegitmization” to cover a broad spectrum of critics of Israeli policy. Rather than focus on global and Jewish concern about Israeli policy that has led to a rise of anti-Semitism in several countries– including our own — the leaders of Israel and of the American Jewish community want to deflect any legitimate criticism and debate by labeling all efforts to challenge Israeli policy as “delegitimizing Israel.” It is just the latest strategy to silence the debate. It is Israel’s illegitimate and immoral policies that lead to the “delegitimization” of Israel.
Change in America
Beinart’s article is significant because it is written by a well- known and well-respected young Jewish intellectual and because it is part of a broader change in the debate about Israel in American society.
Over the past few years, more and more Americans have dared to face the wrath of the powerful Israel lobby by raising these issues in the public realm. They have been vilified by Jewish leaders, yet they have courageously created an environment where questions that were previously silenced are now part of the debate. Several books have opened the debate and the Internet has played a major role. Progressive Israeli and American bloggers tell the story of Palestinian suffering and of anti-democratic actions by Israel on a daily basis. These reports are painful to read and profoundly disturbing. Operation Cast Lead in Gaza, the attack on the flotilla and other actions by Israel have also shocked many in America.
These bloggers also write daily about the efforts of the American Jewish Community, the Israel lobby and the Israeli government to stifle debate in America and about the lack of reporting on issues relating to Palestinian suffering in the mainstream press.
This change has lead to an increasingly open debate in America about Israel policy: on university campuses, in churches and some synagogues, in the press and on the Internet. American can no longer hide from this reality, nor should we.
How do we, as liberal Jews, respond to this debate?
Beinart: Two forms of Zionism
In his article Beinart argues that there are two versions of Zionism: There is a Zionism that, in response to persecution of Jews, believes that the entire world is against us and that our only option is to exercise our Jewish solidarity and power.
And there is a liberal, humanistic Zionism that is “gasping for air” in Israel today. It is a Zionism that understands, in Beinart’s words, that “the best way to memorialize Jewish suffering is through the ethical use of Jewish power.” He believes that it is this form of Zionism that will inspire our children and is worth fighting for.
The young Israelis who protest weekly at Sheikh Jarah, the Jerusalem neighborhood where Jewish settlers have displaced Palestinian residents. give voice to this Zionism as do the many peace and human rights groups in Israel.
Beinart writes: “What if we told the next generation of Jews that it faces a challenge as momentous as any in Jewish history: to save liberal democracy in the only Jewish state on earth? What if we shared an uncomfortable Zionism, a Zionism angry at what israel risks becoming and in love with what it still could be”?
Beinart’s article is courageous and important to all Jews concerned about Judaism and the future of Jewish values. Many of us are profoundly concerned about what Israel is becoming and we should all be in love with what it still could be. It is vitally important for us to support courageous Israelis of all kinds who are fighting for a just Israel. We need to teach our communities about these efforts, take Jews to Israel to meet progressive Israelis and invite them into our communities. For the Jewish identity of our children, we need to find a way for them to connect to progressive Jewish culture in Israel and to progressive groups that uphold our core beliefs. We also need to make sure that when they go to Israel they also see the Palestinian reality and meet Palestinians who are working for peace. This is the best chance we have to foster a positive and hopeful connection to Israel. This has been the focus of my work for the past three decades and it continues to be one essential part of what we need to do.
Jews and American Policy
And we need to go beyond this. We live in America and it is as American citizens that we need to act. The United States government provides more aid to Israel than to any other country on earth and yet our government has allowed Israel to settle half a million people on the West Bank and rarely intervenes when Israel engages in egregious discrimination such as the fifth demolition of the village of El Arakib just a few days ago. Our government always provides diplomatic cover for Israel as it did after Operation Cast Lead and the Flotilla incident.
It is time for turn our moral angst about Israeli policy to ending the suffering of the victims. It is time for us to address the direct and indirect responsibility that we have as American Jews for the discrimination and suffering of Palestinians. As the Obama administration pushes Israel, it will face huge resistance from the mainstream Jewish community, the Israeli lobby and many members of Congress.
The House in Silwan
Last year I told the story of standing on the ruins of a demolished Palestinian home in Silwan and listening to residents talk about their children who had been arrested in the middle of the night for throwing stones at the bulldozers that destroyed the house. I turned to my colleague in Rabbis for Human Rights and said, “I can’t bear to hear the story anymore, you see many such incidents how do you stand it? He turned to me and looked me in the eye and said,”How do I stand it? How do you stand it? You pay for it!”
He told me that a representative of the American consulate had been present at the demolition, that America apparently didn’t have the power to stop an action of blatant housing discrimination that would horrify most liberal Americans including, maybe especially, liberal American Jews. Liberal American Jews have played a major role in the struggle to provide equal housing opportunity in America.
Yes, we pay for it and the United States covers for Israeli discrimination and all the injustice that Beinart describes in his article. And the leadership of American Jewry, including many rabbis and even some of the leaders of the Reform movement, are vocal advocates ensuring that the U.S. defends Israel when it commits human rights violations. This was clear after Operation Cast Lead, in the vicious vilification of Judge Goldstone and in the response to the attack on the flotilla. This direct role the U.S. policy has in supporting the Occupation became clear to me on that visit to Silwan and it became particularly clear during our most recent stay in Israel.
From our vantage point of living in Jerusalem, I could see the direct effects of American Jews’ support for the policies of the Israeli government. Every day the Israeli government acts to further settle the West Bank, to dispossess Palestinians from their homes, to steal more Palestinian land, to squeeze them into smaller and smaller pieces of land. Every day these actions make a peace between the Palestinians and Israelis less likely. The silence of the American government along with the massive support that America gives to Israel is what makes this all possible. Without this support Israel could never continue these policies. At any point, if America were to act on our basic principles and insist that Israel as a democracy stop wholesale ethnic discrimination against Palestinians, it would stop, or at a minimum there would be a profound change.
Those Israelis on our bus were right. Without American support Israel would not have been able to masively expand settlements: without significant and serious American pressure there is no hope for a solution. All of it is financed and supported by American government and it is our community, the American Jewish community, that plays a major role in securing the support of the United States and in silencing the debate about American policy in our country. Israel relies on the American Jewish community and the Israel lobby to maintain the consistent overwhelming and blind support of the U.S. Congress.
As I watched this in Jerusalem, it became clear to me that I needed to act as an American citizen to call on my government to hold Israel accountable. We liberal Jews have been relatively quiet; some of us have supported Israeli peace groups, but we have not been as active in regard to American foreign policy. Many liberal Jews even join in the silencing of dissent in America. When churches in America discuss taking a position on Israeli policy — as the Presbyterians did this summer — the mainstream Jewish community mobilizes its leaders and rabbis to warn our non-Jewish friends that taking action on Israel will threaten Christian-Jewish relations and that their action is anti Semitic.
As a liberal American Jew, I want to join with other American citizens calling for a more moral and responsible American policy in regard to Israel. Of course, Israel is entitled to security, our people feel vulnerable and we too have suffered, but our suffering in the past does not give us any right to inflict suffering on another people. The message of our Torah is the opposite: that our suffering should sensitize us to the suffering of others. I am a supporter of the Israeli peace groups but I now see myself as a American Jew with a responsibility to demand that my government intervene to uphold the core values of our faith by insisting that Israel end the violation of human rights, end the settlement policy, and make real commitment to justice for the Palestinians.
For too long have we been vocal about human rights violations everywhere in the world but silent when Palestinian homes are demolished or when Palestinians are thrown out of their homes and replaced by extremist right wing Jewish settlers who are protected fully by the Israeli government, army and police and supported by our money and political support.
How can we hold up one standard in America and another in Israel? What we believe must happen here in America is what should happen in Israel. It is not complicated.
American Jews are beginning to take action.
A few years ago, J Street was formed as an alternative to the Israeli lobby. J Street defines its mission as pro-Israel and pro-peace and supports efforts by the President and the Congress to pressure Israel and the Palestinians toward a two state peace settlement. It is an organization that challenges the power the Israel lobby has over Congress and it works to open debate in the Jewish community. It supports members of Congress and candidates who are pro-peace. In February, J Street will be holding a conference and I would encourage those of you who are interested to attend. I believe there have also been efforts to establish a local chapter here in Ithaca.
Another Jewish organization that has been active in regard to U.S. policy for many years is Jewish Voice for Peace. While J Street is an explicitly Zionist organization, Jewish Voice for Peace includes Zionists, non-Zionists and anti-Zionists, as well as many non-Jewish Americans. JVP advocates for peace achieved through justice and full equality for both Palestinians and Israelis. JVP seeks an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem; security and self-determination for Israelis and Palestinians; a just solution for Palestinian refugees based on principles established in international law; an end to violence against civilians; and peace and justice for all peoples of the Middle East. It is a strong and consistent voice calling for a U.S. policy that promotes democracy and human rights. Again, I believe there is an effort to establish a local chapter of JVP here in Ithaca.
Palestinian civil society has called for a global non-violent movement – B.D.S.: Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions to end the Israeli policy of oppression and discrimination against their people. Many Americans, including many American Jews, are involved in this effort. We often criticize Palestinians for violent resistance. BDS is a totally nonviolent effort to end oppression. Going as far back as the Exodus from Egypt, there is no example in human history of a political system where a privileged group gives up its privilege without enormous pressure. And in Israel, there is no incentive to give it up. Why would the settlers living in beautiful homes with exquisite views on the West Bank give up this privilege without any pressure to do so (and with full funding from the U.S.)
The B.D.S. movement makes many Jews anxious. There are many legitimate concerns in our community, especially about the academic or cultural boycott, that must be discussed. I hope that we will have a chance to do so in this community. The Israeli government and some in the Jewish community have decided to draw a red line, putting anyone who supports B.D.S. beyond the pale. This is a huge mistake. While we may oppose specific boycotts like the academic boycott or cultural boycott, many Israelis support a boycott of products produced on the West Bank. Just this past week, Israeli actors and directors decided to boycott the new publicly funded theater in Ariel on the West Bank. Their action is supported by 100 American playwrights including Tony Kushner, Cynthia Nixon, and Theodore Bikel. Does this make Theodore Bikel beyond the pale? Does it put all the Israeli actors and directors beyond the pale? This is definitely a profoundly challenging issue but the way to deal with it is not by calling those who advocate B.D.S. traitors. Enough of name calling. It is time for an open discussion.
And this brings me to our congregation.
We are a diverse congregation with many different relationships to Israel. Some of us have never even visited Israel. For some of us, like myself, Israel is a central part of my identity as a Jew. Some of us have family in Israel. And all of us feel a special connection to that land. Facing these questions is challenging.
I urge you as individuals and as a community to be concerned “at what Israel risks becoming and in love with what it still could be.” What happens in Israel affects and will continue to affect all Jews.
There are many different ways to take action. We don’t all have to do the same thing.
We have started by holding listening circles and we need to continue listening and learning. I personally am especially grateful to those members of the congregation who disagree with my position but have been prepared to listen. I look forward to listening carefully to opposing points of view and to a continued respectful and sometimes difficult conversation.
We need to go beyond just listening. We also need to take action, whether it be to challenge the the Reform leadership as our Board recently did, to support J Street, Jewish Voice for Peace, Taanit Tzedek, Americans for Peace, Israeli peace or human rights groups to name just a few possibilities.
“You don’t live here, you don’t understand”
We can no longer be silenced by those who say, “What right do you have to criticize Israel, you don’t live there, you don’t have to pay the price for the consequences of your actions”?
Yes, we don’t live there and the citizens of Israel must decide their own future. Our responsibility is for the role our own government and our own community plays in Israel.
Whether we like it or not, as Americans we are directly involved in Israel. The question is how we will be involved — as those who uncritically support Israeli policy or those who call on our government to advocate for the same values we support here in America and to support those in Israel who are upholding those values? I trust that this community will be a space of open debate on these issues and a community that will act to promote justice, compassion and equity in America, in Israel and throughout the world.
Lastly, this sermon not really about Zionism or Israel but about Judaism. What kind of Judaism will we support: a Judaism that is based on universal human values or a Judaism that privileges the rights of Jews above the rights of other people? Reform Judaism has a proud history of upholding the prophetic vision of Judaism with the core values of justice and compassion for all human beings. What’s at stake in the issues I have raised this morning is our religious faith and legacy. The stakes could not be higher.
I want to end with the same kavvanah with which I began:
Arundhati Roy writes: “The trouble is that once you see it, you can’t unsee it. And once you’ve seen it, keeping quiet, saying nothing, becomes as political an act as speaking out. There is no innocence. Either way you are accountable.”
We have both seen and heard and we are accountable.
L’maan achai v’reyai adaberah na shalom bach.
L’maan beyt Adonai eloheynu avaksha tov lach.
For the sake of my brothers, my sisters and friends
I will speak of peace
For the sake of this planet, the House of God, may I seek goodness and blessing to all.
May the Source of Life bless us with the strength to seek peace for all our brothers and sisters, for Israeli Jews and for Palestinians.
For the sake of this planet, the House of God, may we seek goodness and blessing for all.
I wish you and your families a year of blessing and joy.
May we all write and seal ourselves in the book of life, blessing — and peace.
Shana Tova.
Rabbi Brian Walt 
Kol hakavod to you, Rabbi Brian, for giving this impassioned and valuable sermon. And thank you for putting it online so that it can be read by a community beyond the walls of your shul.
Wishing you a sweet Sukkot.
Thanks for this sermon, Rabbi Brian. You are such a blessing to our Ithaca community!
You bring us light where there has been darkness.
Your inclusiveness of strategies for achieving justice at this difficult time calls me home.
Thank you, Rabbi Brian, for your truth seeking and truth telling by visiting and seeing for yourself what I have seen. I am so grateful for the risk you take in sharing this sermon. You are a true prophetic rabbi, of whom the Jewish people can be proud. You show forth the true nature of the beautiful faith of Judaism.
Thank you Beth, Rev. Catherine and Rabbi Rachel for your kind comments.
May God spread over us and over Jerusalem the sukkah of peace, a sukkah of justice and compassion.
Thank you, Rabbi, thank you, for this prophetic word from the Most High. All blessings for the New Year to your and your congregation.
Shalom,
Pastor Paul N. Johnson, Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada
I have appreciated reading your latest post, your sermon for Yom Kippur. As a non-Jew I can begin to understand how progressive Jews are anguished and truly saddened by the policies of the State of Israel. When Israel is criticized the label “anti-semite” is thrown at the critics, so it is enlightening to read how members of the Jewish community suffer the same slights. The quote by Arundhati Roy applies to all and I thank you for blessing my day and giving me insight and encouragement.
Thanks, Phil, for your comment. It is so important for progressive Jews, Christians and Muslims to join together. So many Christians find themselves silenced on this issue as they find if they say anything critical it potentially damages their long standing relationships with Jewish friends. Christians should not be silenced by being called “anti-semites” just because they are critical of Israeli government policy. As I indicated in the sermon many liberal Jews play a role silencing the church when it addresses the Middle East. I hope that we can build allies across religious boundaries.
Thanks for your kind words and I wish you strength and courage.
Over the years I have watched, listened and learned from you. And while many of us have become beleaguered, and hopeless
from our unrequited call to the Jewish community to wake up, you, Rabbi Brian, do not seem to weary. I think instead you are
becoming more mature,
more focused and more astute in your call. Thank you for your courage and unflagging devotion to all of us, may we never let up until the injustice
has been repaired and there are two nations living side by side.
Rabbi Tirzah Firestone,
Congregation Nevei Kodesh
Boulder, Colorado
Thanks Reb Tirzah. I have learned much from you as well. Right now I am not weary but committed even though I don’t think much, if anything, is going to come from the “peace process.” Things are changing in America outside of the Jewish community and it has already woken us up.
May a sukkah of peace and justice enfold us all.
Chag Sameach! May sukkot bring us all joy and hope.
Brian, I read your eloquent message and I agree whole heartedly that we cannot as a civilized society that has felt the brunt of what jew haters practiced for centuries practice the same hatred against Palestinians? There is of course a major underlying problem which avoids being addressed. It is one we are all familiar with but remains in the background. We know the birth rate among Palestinian as well as other Arab countries far exceeds that of Jews. We know but rarely speak of it that Arabs living in Israel will in a matter of 3-4 generations exceed the number of Jews in Israel. Can you restrict these people from education, from holding political office? Of cource not! Will we still have a Jewish Homeland? Do we abandon that concept? Will it work with a miniority population? Do we request that all arabs convert to Judaism if the wish to live in Israel and enjoy the benefits afforded Jews? The truth is we cannot proceed with a well conceived plan until we address this major but unspoken issue. Sel
Thanks, Sel, for your comment. I think to focusing on demography has led us to many cruel and inhumane acts. We need to envision two states or one state where all people have equal rights. Many Jews just see one state as suicide even though there are many options within the framework of one state in which both peoples could be guaranteed security and cultural rights. There could be areas that are predominantly Jewish, areas that are predominantly Palestinian and increasingly, over time, more areas that are mixed.
If America really pressures Israel there is still a chance for two states although I don’t think the Administration has the power to move in this direction even if it wanted to. It is not going to commit political suicide by pressuring Israel.
A conversation to be continued.
Dear Brian;
Ithaca is blessed to have found you.
Great talk on peace and our personal responsibility to create it.
I’d love to read a High Holiday message that you gave at Mishkan years ago. You traced two consecutive timelines since 1949. One timeline (perspective) was Israeli the other Palestinian. To see the same events from opposing points of view was fascinating, revealing and tragic.
Could you post it on your blog sometime soon?
Your friends in Philadelphia still remember that sermon and the experience we shared hearing you map out the events that have lead us to the place we are today.
L’SHANNA TOVA to you and your family
Nicholas
Rabbi,
I very much appreciate the moral urge to goodness that you suggest. The theological question of what is the range of “Loving thy neighbor as thyself”, the mitzvah that we accept at the initiation of all prayer is an important question.
I attempt to apply it to all, but I clearly apply it more intently to my family, extended family, community.
I don’t think that that is in conflict with a spiritual and moral approach, as the mending of the rip can only happen where I have some control or direct or even indirect influence.
Judaism in practice is very grass roots, close to home.
The single-state proposal contains many attractive features that appeal to Jewish and American values of equality before God, equal rights.
And, it contains many unattractive features, some inherent in the proposal itself, and some in application (as Zionism contains attractive features, and unattractive ones when applied less than attentively).
The jewel of Jewish self-governance (contrasting with long history of Jewish subordination) is important to preserve currently. American liberal Jewish consciousness (with few holocaust survivors) is very different than European and Israeli (with MANY holocaust survivors, and also with many more modern instances of anti-semitism).
If we are to pursue idealism, we have to do so soberly, noting that our idealism is a fundamental change, a fundamental change to others, that we might not be willing to impose on ourselves. (“Do not do unto others what you would not have done to yourself.”)
Thanks.
Richard Witty
Great Oresentation and Ceremony, it is people like you that make the world a better place to be, it is people like you that keep the candle of hope
IK
Great Presentation and Ceremony, it is people like you that make the world a better place to be, it is people like you that keep the candle of hope
IK
Dear Rabbi Walt,
As a rabbi and a citizen of the State of Israel, I was appalled to read the content of your Yom Kippur sermon. You took advantage of a captive audience to deliver a virulent attack on Israel in a context that deprived “the accused” of the slightest opportunity to defend herself. Even courts of law in dictatorships do better than that, even if the opportunity they provide the defendent is only formal and just for the record.
Whereas your comments might have a place in the context of a panel debate, I feel sorry for a congregation that comes to synagogue on Yom Kippur looking for spiritual inspiration and has to sit through such abuse.
There could not be a clearer indication of your political views than your obvious sympathy with elements of the B.D.S. campaign. You criticize those who call advocates of B.D.S. traitors and you call for an open discussion. However, the very last thing you did on Yom Kippur was to provide that.
While Israel is no paragon of virtue, she faces challenges and difficulties that, fortunately, you in Ithaca don’t have to confront. Your criticism lacked any recognition of the context of the challenges that Israel faces and the very real dangers that she confronts.
Our contrasting views could form the subject of a lively debate, but, as a rabbi, I would question whether a Yom Kippur sermon is the appropriate context for it.
Mo’adim l’simcha,
Rabbi Michael (Micky) Boyden
Kehilat Yonatan
Hod Hasharon
Israel
Dear Rabbi Boyden,
Thanks so much for your passionate comment. Clearly we have a disagreement on Israeli policy.
In your note you don’t address the issues that I raised in the sermon based on my own experience and the article by Peter Beinart about the disturbing anti-democratic trends in Israeli society. Are you arguing that the demolition of El Arakib or or El Farsiya can be justified by “the context of the challenges Israel faces?” What does the context have to do with such blatant acts of discrimination. I fully understand that Israel faces security issues but aren’t they exacerbated by acts like these and by the settling of a half a million Jews on the West Bank and in East Jerusalem, often on land that is stolen from the Palestinian owners. B’tzelem and Peace Now have documented how settlements are established on private Palestinian land. My argument is that these actions should shock any liberal Jew, in fact any Jew who cares about the teachings of Judaism. Do you disagree with this? Does “the context” justify these actions? Do you believe they add to Israel’s security or do they make it more vulnerable? My argument is both practical and moral: these actions violate core values of Judaism and that they endanger Israel’s security, both in the short term and the long term.
I have witnessed a home demolition in Jerusalem with my own eyes and I saw the anger and fury it evoked for the Palestinian owners and the people living in the village.
Lastly, I am not an Israeli citizen. While I have spent significant time in Israel and am deeply connected to many Israeli friends and colleagues and to Israeli Jewish culture and literature, I have chosen to live in the Diaspora. I am a Diaspora Jew, like you, before you made aliya. As a citizen of America and a member of the American Jewish community I am directly involved in all these actions of the Israeli government. I don’t have any right to vote in an Israeli election or to participate in your political process. My responsibility as an American citizen is to uphold the same values that I uphold as an American citizen in regard to any other country in the world.
As a liberal Jew I oppose racism, militarism and discrimination in America and I oppose it in Israel. Seeing my government and my community provide the financial and diplomatic support that enables Israel to engage in these acts with impunity, I feel compelled to be an advocate in America as an American citizen for a US policy that truly upholds American values.
Thanks again for your comment and for the dialogue.
Shabbat Shalom,
Rabbi Walt
You give ammunition to those who would destroy Israel as a Jewish state. You hardly even pay lip service to the reality that Israel has sought peace with her neighbors from the outset. When Egypt and Jordan offered real (though not ideal) peace, Israel jumped at the offers, and both nations have benefited. So would the Palestinians, but you encourage them to continue to talk of one state solutions which is simply an unsubtle code for the destruction of the Jewish State. You may revel in the approbation of comments like those posted above, but believe me, I am far from alone in thinking you have gone way too far.
Dear Rabbi Fuchs,
Thanks so much for your comment. I fully understand that there are many different views in our community to the right and to the left of mine and yours. I think this could be a strength if we could have a respectful dialogue among Jews of many different opinions. Sadly, this is lacking in the American Jewish community as a result of the silencing by the American Jewish leadership.
I don’t agree that Israel has always been eager for peace. President Carter pushed Menachem Begin kicking and screaming into the agreement with Egypt. Moreover, how does the massive settlement and expropriation of land on the West Bank including East Jerusalem indicate an enthusiasm for peace? You can’t negotiate the sharing of a ceke while one party is continually eating slice after slice.
If a two state solution giving the Palestinians a viable state, is still possible, I support all efforts to make this happen. Personally, my commitment is to equality and human rights for everyone, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Israeli Palestinian. This is my understanding of the most important teaching of our faith.
Thanks for your comment and for participating in the dialogue.
May our machloket be l’shem shamayim, a disagreement based on different notions of what would be the most ethical and humane outcome.
Shabbat Shalom,
Rabbi Walt
Dear Brian,
Thank you, as always, for your unique inspiration and clarity. The sentences that seem especially important for us, as American Jews:
“This sermon not really about Zionism or Israel but about Judaism. What kind of Judaism will we support: a Judaism that is based on universal human values or a Judaism that privileges the rights of Jews above the rights of other people?”
But in that inspiring question may also be a problem regarding American Jews’ relationship with Israel: there are presumably very few Israelis who pose or even understand that question you’ve posed. With few exceptions, Israelis are either secular, in which case they’d be puzzled by your question and would reply, “I don’t practice Judaism; I’m just Israeli” or they are Orthodox, in which case they don’t feel any sense of conflict or choice about what kind of Judaism to support.
This is not to imply that either group lacks a basis for moral action. There are many secular and Orthodox Israelis who do believe in universal human values and act upon them, but their beliefs and actions, in both cases, have a basis (and there are a number of alternative possibilities) different from the one you’ve proposed.
I don’t think that means that American Jews can’t communicate with Israelis, but it seems to me that this difference in religious/ ethical grounding is significant and should be articulated, and could be an impediment to our creating change there, even if most American Jews advocated progressive, universal Jewish human values.
With thanks and warm wishes to you all for a healthy, peaceful year.
Jan
Thanks, Jan, for your thought provoking comment. You always challenge me to delve deeper into the issues and I learn so much from you. I have been thinking about your comment. It makes me sad, that as you say, most Jews, here and there, don’t care about or have given up on Judaism as a meaningful ethical system. They derive their ethics elsewhere and some of them are inspiring in their ethical commitment. Those for whom Judaism is central to their lives, are most likely to understand the tradition as supporting privileging Jews over non-Jews.
Sometimes I wonder whether there is any point to trying to reclaim a prophetic Judaism or just to emphasize a universal ethic that is not based on religion. For me, prophetic Judaism is part of my bones and I have made it the center of my life’s work. Prophetic Judaism calls us to be in solidarity with the oppressed, in this situation, the Palestinians.
What matters most is not where we derive our ethics but whether our actions help to end suffering and injustice. I don’t believe God (our deepest/highest selves) cares where it comes from but rather that we do it.
God has told you human beings what God requires of you: To Act Justly, to be compassionate and to walk humbly.
I will think about your question more and would love to hear what you and others think.
All the Best,
Brian
I have read the sermon with sadness. I have read most of the comments above with amazement. How can so many people deny tiny Israel her right to security while ignoring the horrible treatment of women and other human rights violations of so many countries in the Arab world? How can so many accept the reality of many Islamic an Christian states in the world but deny the legitimacy of a tiny Jewish state? Rabbi Fuchs and Rabbi Boyden above really hit the nail on the head. I am grateful for their voices of sanity among the anti Israel comments above. Rabbi Brian and those who agree with him seem to think their should be a state for everyone except the Jews.
It’s as dishonest a sermon as ever has been delivered. For example, “JVP seeks an end to the Israeli occupation of the …Gaza Strip.” Israel left the Gaza Strip to only receive thousands of missiles fired at their citizens. What shameful dishonesty this sermon is.
This was a superb sermon, and I will distribute it in my community.
My response is to Mr. Calhoun, who is correct to note that injustice permeates many societies across the globe. He is correct to say that it would be a mistake to focus only on the injustices committed by Israel. Rabbi Brian, however, is clearly cognizant of these injustices, and asks only that Israel be held to the same standard as other societies. He is speaking specifically to an American audience and asking that we stop ignoring offenses against human rights in Israel that we would never tolerate for a moment on our own soil. Injustice in Islamic, Christian, or other countries does not in any way justify human rights violations in Israel. What would (does) it say about American Jews when we bristle at the mere mention of home demolitions in East Jerusalem and dismiss those who speak of this out loud as anti-Semites or self-hating Jews?
What good does it do for the world – or for Jews – to have a state for Jews if that state belligerently violates Jewish values? The legitimacy of the “tiny Jewish state” is undermined by its daily deployment of violence to become less tiny by the minute.
As Jews, we are obligated to object when a Jewish state blatantly betrays our Jewish values. As Americans, we are obliged to resist when our government enables this betrayal with its political influence and with our tax dollars.
It is not Rabbi Brian who delegitimizes Israel. Israel is taking care of that – not all by itself, but with our American support.
Americans criticizing Israel’s human rights record ? You’re joking. You do recall the millions of innocents the U.S. has slaughtered? Vietnam, Iraq, etc. etc. What farcical hypocrisy.